<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One year of Tech Flaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.techflaws.org/2009/04/01/one-year-of-tech-flaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.techflaws.org/2009/04/01/one-year-of-tech-flaws/</link>
	<description>Things can only get better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin</title>
		<link>http://blog.techflaws.org/2009/04/01/one-year-of-tech-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.techflaws.org/?p=134#comment-7725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, considering the community efforts on the official forums, I&#039;d say not all is lost. Since I set my WDTV to static IPs (and flushed the router tables), I&#039;m having no problems with shares anymore. And I think it&#039;s cool they do put out new firmwares with bug fixes for a device that&#039;s almost 3 years old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, considering the community efforts on the official forums, I&#8217;d say not all is lost. Since I set my WDTV to static IPs (and flushed the router tables), I&#8217;m having no problems with shares anymore. And I think it&#8217;s cool they do put out new firmwares with bug fixes for a device that&#8217;s almost 3 years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Lix</title>
		<link>http://blog.techflaws.org/2009/04/01/one-year-of-tech-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Lix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.techflaws.org/?p=134#comment-7720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where is te class action suits against these defective products? This device has been around for years and the one I bought was rev 1,00,00. Took it back before any updates cames out. Too much self-paid spam out there on review sites telling us how wonderful the device is. Any company that plays the dirty advertising doesn&#039;t deserve anybody but a fool&#039;s business. They ned to concentrate their money on correcting an I&#039;m sorry POS box.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is te class action suits against these defective products? This device has been around for years and the one I bought was rev 1,00,00. Took it back before any updates cames out. Too much self-paid spam out there on review sites telling us how wonderful the device is. Any company that plays the dirty advertising doesn&#8217;t deserve anybody but a fool&#8217;s business. They ned to concentrate their money on correcting an I&#8217;m sorry POS box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin</title>
		<link>http://blog.techflaws.org/2009/04/01/one-year-of-tech-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-6226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.techflaws.org/?p=134#comment-6226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually watch from USB only but whenever I test the network, shares are working for me. Having said that, I certainly can understand your frustration but I guess this is just a matter of you get what you pay for. The WDTV is pretty cheap for what it does and from what I&#039;ve read so far, other players which cost twice as much are riddled with bugs as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually watch from USB only but whenever I test the network, shares are working for me. Having said that, I certainly can understand your frustration but I guess this is just a matter of you get what you pay for. The WDTV is pretty cheap for what it does and from what I&#8217;ve read so far, other players which cost twice as much are riddled with bugs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Lix</title>
		<link>http://blog.techflaws.org/2009/04/01/one-year-of-tech-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Lix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.techflaws.org/?p=134#comment-6224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to hear some honesty about this half-baked device. It wouldbe nice to see WD actually put some effort into this device. As of June 2012 the unit I borrowed still had real fllakey problems staying connected to remote shares. It was pot luck whether it would work at all each morning when turning it on. Still a piece of junk. The sharing from a local drive on it worked quite well after an hour of trying to get it to see a USB memkey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear some honesty about this half-baked device. It wouldbe nice to see WD actually put some effort into this device. As of June 2012 the unit I borrowed still had real fllakey problems staying connected to remote shares. It was pot luck whether it would work at all each morning when turning it on. Still a piece of junk. The sharing from a local drive on it worked quite well after an hour of trying to get it to see a USB memkey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
